Miscellany

[Because many internet sites are continually changing, all of the links below are to screenshots of the original web pages. Some whitespace is caused by flash media content which the screen capture program was not able to reproduce. -WRF]

There are many media outlets which have been trying very hard to identify the Arizona Shooter, Jared Loughner, with the "fringe right" or "neo-nazi" groups. Among such outlets are the Daily Mail (London), www. allyourtv. com, www. conspiracy. me, www. antifascistencyclopedia. com and even quite obscure sites such as my. firedoglake. com. They are all evidently clamoring to "blame Whitey". The infowars.com website has reported that Janet Napolitano of the DHS along with certain Fox News staff and others have connected Loughner to right-wing or conservative "extremist" or even "White Supremacist" groups.

This Facebook page has turned out to be a fake. Along with this, several fake videos relating to the recent shootings perpetrated by Jared Loughner have also been produced. We apologize for initially having been mislead into thinking that this page was real - and not having investigated it for ourselves but rather having trusted certain associates.

However, once we did investigate Jared Loughner more thoroughly, it seems as though this page really was not very far from the truth, although it is highly exaggerated. It seems as though there is no mention anywhere of the women in Loughner's life - except for his mother, who is reported to be a jewess. His reading seems to be both right and left - if indeed he ever read Mein Kampf - yet he may be described more accurately as a liberal, pot-smoking hippy than a right-wing extremist. See our more recent article entitled Jared Loughner and the Propaganda of the Left.

In Sword Brethren's defense, he informed us that news agencies did originally report the Arizona shooter's name as Jared Laughner, and he is correct. We have verified as much from two sources, and facsimiles of their webpages are found here for the Huffington Post and Business Insider.

But wait, there's more (as if they had to go back and do one better)...

The first page was from an online source, a Pennsylvania news site. The second page is the one captured by Sword Brethren.

If merely the Foreword of Albert Speer's 1969 memoir Inside the Thrid Reich is little but useless drivel, the book cannot be trusted. Here we will add some comments following the various paragraphs in Speer's Foreword to his book, as it was translated into English by Richard and Clara Winston and published by The MacMillan Company.

Speer begins:

As to what follows, I wish I'd have had this information for last night's (July 20th, 2011) discussion with Jim Condit Jr. This is why it is difficult to believe anything written about Hitler by the jews and the (their) "allies" during and after the war. For every jew writing or saying something about World War II, there is an agenda usually intending to exacerbate "holocaust" stories, demonize Hitler, make him into a hypocrite,and fully discredit his philosophies – which are what the jews truly fear about him.

Last night Condit brought up Otto Strasser - whom I admittedly do not know much about - and Douglas Reed's book about him (Nemesis? The Story of Otto Strasser published in 1940). Looking at Reed's book (see the attached file below to download it here), I would naturally not know much about it under any circumstances, since five minutes with the introduction and opening chapters displays Reed to have a strong anti-Hitler bias and a total lack of objectivity. Therefore Strasser is the ideal subject, as Reed himself admits but not in quite the same manner as I will accuse him here, by which he could write a book merely for the sake of attacking Hitler. The excerpts below are a perfect example of lies made with an agenda, passed off as legitimate "history". We will see passages both from Reed's book, and also from Mein Kampf, along with a few comments.

In 2005 Greg Hallett wrote a book, Hitler Was A British Agent, alleging that Adolf Hitler was actually an agent working for the British government. This book is highly criticized because it offers absolutely not a single of shred documentary evidence to support its allegations. Rather, the claim is based on circumstantial evidence from one Bridget Dowling, allegedly the one-time wife of Adolf Hitler's half-brother, Alois Hitler.