The Holocaust Hoax - Introductions

Ursula Haverbeck points out that with mainstream historical authorities now accepting that Auschwitz was not the scene of the murder of millions of Jews in homicidal gas chambers, there is no established "scene of the crime". She has challenged official bodies including ministers of the various German states (Länder) to provide an answer – to define the scene of the crime. They have so far failed to do so, and she must therefore conclude that there is no substantiation to the official history of Auschwitz.

Ich bin Ursula - Je suis Faurisson

Video source here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1CVP97g-Uc

The interviewer just can't handle the notion that there was no holocaust. Discussing the last days of the prison camps, what had happened in Germany in the closing months of the war, it starts to get comical. His entire frame of reference is based on the conveniences of modern life, and he obviously has no capacity to think outside of that.

This transcript below is originally from http://pastebin.com/xBDxkLcM

"Sylvia Stolz [Posted on Pastebin.com] By: a guest on Jan 16th, 2013"

Banned Speech, banned evidence and banned legal defence.

The reality of "Free Speech"

Our last speaker of the day will be lecturing on banned speech, banned evidence and even a ban on legal defence in court. On top of everything else, being banned from defending yourself in court constitutes a particularly  disturbing problem. This speaker is a fully qualified lawyer and throughout her lecture I find it of particular importance, that we don't let our judgement be influenced by what our eyes and ears have already been shown or told.

She really made the headlines a few years ago, as a defense attorney. So let me briefly explain with whom we are dealing with. This defense attorney has the courage of the lion. She is stronger than a man, and I have never met a woman with such a profile. She bravely stood up and took it upon herself to defend Ernst Zündel in the famous case against him, for so-called 'holocaust denial' She was the trial lawyer of Ernst Zündel During the legal proceedings she provided evidence to the court, which could raise doubts regarding the official account of history. This caused furor in the courtroom. And she was prohibited from speaking any further. This speech-ban was ordered as she was presenting the arguments of the defendant. She was not allowed to argue the case, and barred from listing more evidence.

She ignored the speech-ban and continued to submit evidence. And was then threatened on pain of penalties if she persisted. As it became too much for the authorities, she was arrested right there in the courtroom during her defence of the so-called 'holocaust denier' Ernst Zündel. But not even this could silence her, as she continued to speak the case of her defendant while being forcefully removed from the courtroom. For this she was imprisoned for almost three and a half years, in spite of her having no previous convictions.