Thoughts I had after reading the thread about my "debate" with Jim Condit:
You would all be able to think much clearer, and even perhaps to "see the light", if your heads weren't all full of jewish subterfuge and bullshit. If a jew moves his lips, he is lying. Period.
I am not a military strategist, and I never claimed to be. If any of you bozos ever actually read or listened to my work before running your mouths about me, you would know that. I defeated Condit's arguments on Dunkirk by illustrating Hitler's own actions (i.e. the Last Appeal to Reason and his constant outreach to the English for peace). Condit refuses to see that because he has an agenda, and obviously many of you do also.
I was totally unfamiliar with any of Condit's arguments before talking to him, except for what he had on the front page of his website. Since I am not going to fill my head from the latrine that Condit uses, I will remain blissfully ignorant of his bullshit. You can call it what you may, but I consider it to be good intellectual hygiene.
Douglas Reed posed as an objective historian. In my papers and podcasts on Hitler & National Socialism, I never claimed to be objective. Therefore I am not a hypocrite: you are hypocrites for judging me before examining me.
Jim Condit can be condemned for all of his jewish sources, especially since none of them are corroborated by non-jewish sources! Therefore all of you are found wanting in your defense of him. All of Condit's work on Hitler is based upon the agenda and the lies of the jews. If you support him, then you too are little but pawns of the rabbis.
If you do not like any of this, just go away. Put your head back into DBS' foul kaffir-loving ass. He is a turkey, too.
To the Turkeys at Information Underground